By
|
Alexander
Baron
|
Date
Published: Nov-2002
|
Table
of Contents:
Introduction
We live in an age of
oppressed minorities. Turn on the TV, tune into the radio, pick up a
newspaper, and you are sure to see, hear or read a heartrending plea
from a highly paid spokesman or spokeswoman of some minority or
other expounding at length on how they are oppressed by capitalism,
racism, prejudice, bigotry, and so on, and how they need special
rights, privileges, legal protection, and public money which you -
the taxpayer and ratepayer - should cough up gladly. Indeed, how can
you not be ashamed at the way these poor people have suffered in the
past, and how they continue to suffer now?
Blacks
continue to claim that they are oppressed because of slavery - yes,
slavery. Women - who make up 51% of the adult population - are also
an oppressed minority, black women doubly so. Moslems are no less
adept at claiming victim status, and of course, the world's whipping
boy since time immemorial has been and continues to be the Jew. Or
so Jewish spokesmen never tire of telling us.
None
of these claims is entirely without merit. Blacks are among the
highest paid sportsmen in the world, including particularly
heavyweight boxing, which they dominate. Black men and women are
also among the world's highest paid entertainers. But you don't have
to look far to find especially young, lower class black men who have
had a raw deal - even in the land of the free. Women not only own
more wealth than men, they also outlive us, but the rape statistics
in our supposedly civilised society should make all men hang their
heads in shame. Moslems are among the wealthiest people in Britain,
but far from all of them, and as I write these words there are
Moslems suffering and dying in Occupied Palestine, India and many
other countries. And however much all Moslems may abhor the
poisonous ideology of political Zionism, there are innocent Jews
suffering in “Israel” and many other countries either because of
or in spite of Jewish racial supremacy.
Indeed,
it is probably true that each and every one of us belongs to some
oppressed minority; wealthy and powerful middle aged, middle class
white men are more prone to stress and heart attacks than most other
groups. Be that as it may, it is a fallacy that all minorities are
oppressed. Convicted murderers are a very tiny minority, but none of
us should lose any sleep over the fact that those rightly convicted
of the ultimate crime are deprived of their liberty for many years,
in some cases forever.
Another
such minority, albeit one that is somewhat lower down the hierarchy
of infamy than murderers, are practising homosexuals. In our ordered
universe, Jews, Moslems, trades unionists, sportsmen, and many
others, are bound by blood, religion, ideology or common interest.
So too increasingly are homosexuals, and like all these others, the
Organised Homosexual Movement has its spin doctors, to borrow a
phrase from New Labour. Though spin is a relatively new term, spin
itself is as old as the hills; it is better known as propaganda.
Propaganda is not necessarily a bad thing, else why proselytise the
Faith? But propaganda that is aimed at normalising perversion,
degradation, filth and squalor must be recognised for what it is,
and fought tooth and claw. Such is the propaganda of the Organised
Homosexual Movement.
“Gay”
Propaganda
In
July 1960, a series in the girls' comic School Friend was called The
Gay Princess, while in October 1961, another girls' comic, June,
referred to its Star of the Week as “gay Helen Shapiro”. (1)
Today, a gay princess and a gay singer would have entirely different
connotations. In his autobiography, published some five years later,
a senior Scottish police officer recounted how in his younger days
he had been engaged in the suppression of homosexual practices in
the public toilets of Edinburgh.
William
Merrilees might be described as an old-fashioned no-nonsense
“copper”. Before the Second World War when he was head of the
Vice Squad, he was given the task of cleaning up the city's lowlife,
and he did so with alacrity. In a chapter The Campaign Against
Homosexuality, he enthused: “Now that we had convictions to our
credit, I felt free to wage wholesale war on these perverts and
their associates, and quite a number of arrests were made from
urinals throughout the city.” (2)
This
admirable moral crusade was to result in the closure of nine public
urinals and other premises. Nowadays, any police officer who
campaigned against homosexuality would be accused of homophobia, and
one who referred openly to homosexuals as perverts would be hauled
up in front of a disciplinary board. Even then at times rightly
feared British police have been cowed by the constant barrage of gay
propaganda.
Gay,
this happy sounding word, has been verbally kidnapped by the
homosexual lobby. The evidence that homosexuality is gay is close to
non-existent, but by dint of incessant repetition we have reached
the stage where even the staunchest opponents of this perversion
refer openly to homosexuals as gays.
Although
one must always be careful about how one interprets statistics, the
evidence from statistics as from other sources is impressive - or
rather horrifying - that homosexuals are emphatically not gay; that
by and large they die younger, are more prone to violence - both as
victims and as perpetrators - (3) and that they are vectors of the
most abominable diseases known to man.
Any
honest, unbiased person who has studied the medical literature
relating to homosexuality will surely reach the same conclusion.
This is undoubtedly the reason there are so few homosexual doctors.
In
addition to proselytising homosexuality as gay, the Organised
Homosexual Movement has coined an epithet, homophobia, which like
racist or anti-Semite is the modern day equivalent of branding
somebody a witch. In 1997, an American psychiatrist wrote that:
“In 1970, homosexuality was an illness so dangerous to the
commonwealth that the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
was charged with excluding homosexuals from entering the
country...Today, homosexuality is a normal life style; disapproving
of it is a mental illness called 'homophobia'...” (4)
In
a press release dated December 15, 1973, the American Psychiatric
Association became the first medical organisation “to officially
remove the stigma of disease from persons with same-sex
preference”. (5)
One
might ask what new findings were made about homosexuality between
1970 and 1973 to reverse the diagnosis that it is a disease? The
answer is of course none, but the homosexual lobby (6) brought about
this reversal by its persistent and for the most part dishonest
public campaigning and lobbying of government and influential
organisations. Homosexuality is indeed a disease, but a disease of
the spirit.
The
One In Ten Myth
The
statistic that homosexual activists are most fond of spouting is the
mythical one in ten. Writing in the unofficial Labour Party magazine
Briefing, (7) in 1993, the well-known and vocal homosexual activist
Peter Tatchell reports that “10 per cent of the population is
exclusively or predominantly queer...”, (his word); that “15 per
cent are bisexual for all or part of their lives”, while “25-35
per cent have at least one homosexual experience leading to orgasm
during their lifetime...” (8)
These
figures are derived from the so-called researches of Dr Alfred
Kinsey (1894-1956), an American sexologist who published two widely
publicised reports (9) on human sexuality in the late 40s/early 50s.
It is Kinsey's report on the human male that is the most widely
cited. (10)
Kinsey's
remarkable findings extend way beyond mere homosexuality, and anyone
who has read his work with the slightest critical faculty will soon
conclude they would laughable if they were not so sick. For example,
Kinsey and his team report that of boys raised on farms, “about 17
per cent experience orgasm as the product of animal contacts...after
the onset of adolescence” and that up to 28% of college level
rural males have some animal experience to the point of orgasm. Well
over half of these have some kind of sexual contact with animals.
(11)
One
can only imagine what Kinsey understood by the word orgasm, but
leaving that aside it is clear that he is confusing the true
meanings of words and emotions. As the Conservative author Stephen
Green writes poetically of agony aunt Claire Rayner, she uses the
word love too loosely for us to know whether she means friendship,
affection, commitment, or ten minutes in a public convenience. (12)
Two
academics, Reisman (13) and Eichel, who subjected Kinsey's
researches to a close scrutiny, have thoroughly discredited his
findings. Even though “The Kinsey Reports have become the starting
point for subsequent sex research” and “The textbooks quote
Kinsey's findings as if they were undisputed truth”, (14) Kinsey's
research has never been replicated. (15)
Leaving
aside academic studies, mere observation is enough to indicate that
far less than one in ten of the population is homosexual, actively
so or otherwise. The grain of truth in Peter Tatchell's assertion
that “25-35 per cent have at least one homosexual experience
leading to orgasm during their lifetime...” may be that most of us
have some sort of homosexual experience at some time in our lives,
but that depends of course on how you define the term homosexual
experience. If you are propositioned by a homosexual, or if an
openly homosexual man smiles at you lustfully in the street, then
you too have had a homosexual experience.
The
actual percentage of the population that is homosexual - overtly or
otherwise - is extremely difficult to determine. This is made even
more difficult by the fact that homosexuals are concentrated in
certain locations, (16) in certain professions, (17) and that they
make a lot of noise.
The
purpose of the constant repetition of the mythical one in ten is to
attempt further to “normalise” homosexuality. This argument is
in any case spurious, as Sahib Bleher pointed out in a reply to a
query on the Party website: “the assumption [here is] that the
mere existence of a condition justifies its validity, and that
decisions are to be taken on the basis of how much support there is
rather than on the question whether something is morally
justified.”
Using
the same fallacious logic, paedophilia, theft, even murder can be
justified. As stated above, not all minorities are oppressed, and
some deserve to be dealt with severely.
It
is important to recognise that even many people who might otherwise
be considered “right wing” have fallen for much homosexual
propaganda. As well as referring to homosexuals as gay, they often
take the homosexual lobby's self-serving statistics at face value.
(18)
Catch
Them Young
There
is an old maxim - attributed to the Jesuits - that if you school a
child for the first six or seven years of its life, it doesn't
matter who has it for the rest. The age of consent in Britain is now
sixteen. Up until recently the age of consent for homosexual acts
was eighteen. The Labour Government, heavily influenced by both the
homosexuals in its own upper echelons (19) and the homosexual lobby
in general, was intent on lowering the age of consent to sixteen on
the grounds that not to do so would be to perpetuate homophobia. It
did so in spite of a revolt in the Lords led by Baroness Young.
In
February 1994 when a vote to lower the age of consent for sodomy to
sixteen was lost, hundreds of militant homosexuals stormed
Parliament and abused MPs. This was in spite of the House voting to
lower the age of consent to eighteen, which under the circumstances
was certainly a concession to perversion. Peter Tatchell was quoted
in the Times thus: “They have no respect for us, so we will have
no respect for Parliament.” He also threatened a major campaign of
civil disobedience. (20) About ten arrests were reported. (21)
In
November 1998, when the government tried again to lower the age of
consent for homosexual acts, the Lords prevailed. One magazine
reported that Tatchell wanted to push for it to be lowered to
fourteen. Other members of his group, OutRage, voted to keep it at
sixteen (for then) for fear of alienating the public (and exposing
their true agenda). (22)
Two
years later, a letter published in the Daily Telegraph and signed by
nine doctors headed by Lady McEwen, C.A.B. Johnston and Professor
Gordon Stewart warned the government of the Physical dangers of
unnatural sex. Two of the signatories had Islamic names, (23) and
doubtless all Moslem doctors (along with the great majority of all
other religions and none) shared the same sentiments. The
signatories argued that by lowering the age of consent for
homosexual acts the government would be failing in its duty to
protect young boys. Unfortunately, the government and the homosexual
lobby prevailed, and the age of consent for homosexual acts was
indeed lowered.
Now,
Tatchell in particular has come out of the closet. (24) This year he
has published a paper calling for the age of consent to be lowered
to fourteen for all sexual acts. (25) Two examples of his sophistry
from this paper will suffice:
“Two
14 year olds who have a mutually agreed relationship risk maximum
penalties ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment...”
By
the same token, the maximum penalty for shoplifting is seven years
imprisonment. Who in modern Britain has ever been sentenced to seven
years for simple theft? (26)
One
reason Tatchell advocates lowering the age of consent is to cure the
sexual illiteracy of the young. Sex advice by teachers is said to be
vague, euphemistic and even useless. “They never dare promote the
obvious: oral sex and mutual masturbation as safer alternatives to
intercourse”. This is a bit like promoting grievous bodily harm as
a safer alternative to murder, but the duplicity of the Organised
Homosexual Movement knows no bounds.
The
doctors who signed the letter to the Daily Telegraph pointed out
that teenagers often have (what they believe to be) homosexual
desires of a transient nature.
Young
boys in particular may be attracted to other boys and young men for
reasons that have little or nothing to do with sex. Not all of us
are equally endowed with good looks, fine physique, intelligence,
personality, wealth, or even something as simple as dress sense.
This may lead to envy, which can be easily confused with desire.
With proper guidance or even with none, the vast majority of
teenagers will come through this phase unscathed. (27) With improper
guidance they may become convinced that they are really gay and
should come out as such.
Because
homosexuals can't breed they must recruit in order to perpetuate
their perversion, and the younger their victims are caught the
better. Now that the age of consent for homosexual acts has been
lowered to sixteen, Tatchell and his friends want it lowered to
fourteen. If they get that they will demand it be lowered to twelve,
then ten. The end result is that predatory homosexual paedophiles
will have carte blanche to snatch young boys off the streets and do
with them what they will with total impunity. This may sound
hysterical, but there is a paedophile movement in this country and
worldwide which would like to see exactly that. And it is an
acknowledged fact that in Britain at least the paedophile movement
has its roots firmly in the gay movement. (28)
During
his campaign against homosexuality in pre-World War Two Edinburgh,
William Merrilees was shocked at the number of young boys who had
been ensnared by these perverts. In his aforementioned memoirs, he
wrote: “I was astonished at the number of boys between the ages of
fourteen and sixteen engaged in this unpleasant business, some of
them were effeminates, but most of them were really male
prostitutes.” (29) It should be borne in mind that at this time,
and for three decades after, homosexuality was a criminal offence,
yet this was apparently no serious deterrent to those who would
wilfully corrupt the young.
It
is important for everyone to realise that there is no such thing as
gay youth; there are no homosexual teenagers. Even for those who
succumb to their inner demons and experiment with or engage in
homosexual practices there is hope. The young who stray from the
straight and narrow can be reformed, the same way souls can be
saved.
The
Consequences of Unnatural Sex
The
word that springs to mind most readily in connection with the
homosexual lifestyle is AIDS, but there is a plethora of other
exotic and terrible diseases associated with it. While it is true
that homosexuals do not have a monopoly on sexual diseases, the
incidence of almost all diseases amongst them is horrifying.
According to a 1983 study, in 1977 in New York City, 55% of primary,
secondary and early latent syphilis cases were in homosexual males.
(30) “The homosexual male is said to be at ten times greater risk
of contracting syphilis than the heterosexual male.” (31)
Homosexual men were said to be responsible for about half all
reported cases of infectious syphilis in the United States. (32)
Contact
with faecal matter - including ingesting it - greatly enhances all
manner of other diseases besides those of a purely sexual nature,
including the most severe forms of hepatitis. Physical damage is not
only a real possibility but an inevitable consequence of anal
intercourse, which may include inserting fingers, the entire hand
and other objects into the orifice. (33)
No
man or woman of ordinary intelligence who has a gramme of common
sense or human decency could conclude other than that homosexuality
is a curse, a blight and a bane on mankind, and that as far as
possible this perversion should be eradicated, in particular that
the young should be kept out of the clutches of its practitioners
and advocates.
Other
Homosexual Propaganda Techniques
We
have already mentioned the mythical disease of homophobia. This
smear word was coined as recently as 1967. (34) No one should ever
be intimidated by epithets, although many people are, including
powerful politicians. Eichel defines homophobia as a smear term used
to intimidate those who oppose the agendas of homosexual activists.
(35) These anti-homo activists have fought back with an epithet of
their own: heterophobia, which Eichel says is “a term coined here
to refer to those who have an irrational fear of, and hostility
toward, heterosexuality”. (36) Another academic, Masters, makes
the point that: “The cruelest form of injustice employed by the
gay lobby is to accuse sensitive, decent people of bigotry, hatred,
and 'homophobia' for simply following their own moral consciences
and seeing abnormal as abnormal”. (37)
This
sentiment is echoed by an American journalist who wrote: “That
word - homophobia - has always seemed a misnomer. Many people don't
fear the gay culture; they simply and unapologetically hate it. The
idea of same-sex sex gives them the creeps.” (38) This is
undoubtedly true, though the at times open intimidation of this
lobby has coerced most of its opponents into silence, Islam being an
honourable exception.
Another
technique often used against homophobes is the innuendo that they
themselves are repressed homosexuals who are driven by fear of being
“outed” or of some other, more personal fear. This should be
seen for exactly what it is, innuendo. One might just as well accuse
proselytising Moslems of being repressed atheists. It is probably
true that some homosexuals do cloak themselves in lies, but this is
simply plain old hypocrisy, and should be seen as such.
Empathising
with minorities in order to win reciprocal support for their
perversion is another tactic, and one that has met with some
success. In 1995, the Jewish Chronicle reported that the World
Congress of Gay and Lesbian Jewish Organisations had arranged a two
day conference in which it was resolved that “the homosexual
community should become involved in Holocaust education”. Present
at this conference was no less a luminary than the historian (and
Zionist apologist) David Cesarani. The International Association of
Lesbian and Gay Children of Holocaust Survivors was said to have 65
members. (39) Devout Jews who died under the Nazi régime must be
turning in their graves.
Bad
Blood
Probably
the sickest stunt ever pulled by the Organised Homosexual Movement
was to attempt to interfere with blood donor screening. Reisman and
Eichel report that gay activists did this as long ago as 1983 -
AFTER the connection was made between AIDS and blood transfusions.
It has been known since the early 1970s that hepatitis B is a
blood-borne homosexually transmitted disease (40); time honoured
common sense indicates that practising homosexuals should not donate
blood. The idea that “discrimination” against gays is so
terrible that people's lives should be endangered for fear of
causing them offence is not just shameful but wicked.
Ethnic
Minorities Resist Brainwashing
The
subversion of the media, schools, academia and even the government
by the homosexual lobby has not happened overnight, and has not been
total, thankfully. Just as alarming has been the infiltration of the
churches. There is a great schism in the Christian church over this
issue, it is divided roughly between those who have fallen for the
propaganda of the Organised Homosexual Movement, and those who take
a traditional stance which promises homosexuals fire and brimstone,
and damnation for all eternity. There are also, to their credit,
some Christian groups who work with homosexuals to try to weed them
away from their perversion by the power of prayer and by adopting a
spiritual approach to life. These operate mostly in the United
States, and have received very little publicity.
The
overwhelming majority of blacks, African or otherwise, have a
healthy aversion to homosexuality. Black churches in particular have
refused to bow to emotional blackmail, and hopefully will continue
to do so. Attempts to indoctrinate ordinary blacks with the
homosexual poison have been largely unsuccessful (41). In 1994, a
gay pride rally in Brixton, London, resulted in at least twenty
homosexuals being physically attacked, mostly by blacks. (42) [This
is not of course to condone such physical attacks, but the
widespread revulsion caused by the Organised Homosexual Movement's
“in your face” attitude is understandable].
Black
members of the Anglican church have come out firmly against reform
recognising the time honoured principle that in a compromise between
good and evil, evil always wins. At the 1998 Lambeth Conference,
Anglican bishops from Africa and Asia routed attempts by the
brainwashed white liberals of the Western church to normalise
homosexuality, and maintained that it should remain incompatible
with Scripture.
Attempts
by homosexuals to subvert the Jewish religion have met with mixed
success; there have long been gay synagogues in the United States,
but the Orthodox have largely resisted any attempts to pervert the
word of God.
Islam & The Trojan Horse Of Gay “Rights”
The
sole exception among the world's great religions has been Islam.
That modern marvel the Internet is awash with both homosexual
pornography and homosexual proselytising, yet newsgroups for gay
Moslems remain empty, and gay mosques remain unheard of - and
hopefully always will. Having said that, this poison is nothing if
not persistent; perhaps relishing the challenge, homosexuals from
Islamic backgrounds are slowly beginning to organise. A well-funded
gay “Islamic” group, the Al-Fatiha Foundation was established in
the United States (where else?) some time ago. It appears to be
mainly Internet-based, although it held its first international
meeting in Boston in 1998. The thirty participants came from many
countries including Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia.
Unsurprisingly,
Al-Fatiha is also active in Britain; it was reported to have joined
the London gay Mardi Gras on July 6, 2002. When the current writer
logged onto the Al-Fatiha website he found a personal forum where
gay “Muslims” could advertise for “friends”, and links to
other gay sites. One of these showed a logo captioned “Bad
puppy” which depicted a dog with its snout up another dog's anus,
the latter with an expression of delight on its face. There was also
a pop up link depicting a naked homosexual male who was obviously
“hungry” for perverted sex. Such obscene imagery would not be
tolerated in any mosque.
Al-Fatiha's
propaganda is similar to that used by homosexual groups that have
infiltrated the Christian religion. It claims that homosexuals are
being denied their dignity, that religious leaders are bigoted, that
Islamic society is prejudiced, and that homosexual “Muslims” are
stigmatised. Although it has attracted some support (what perversion
hasn't?) the cries of gay “Muslims” that they are oppressed will
hopefully continue to fall largely on deaf ears.
AIDS & Africa
Although
some Moslems have been lured into homosexual practices, the
overwhelming majority reject them as either sinful (as of course
they are) or as examples of Western decadence. It is a sad fact, but
the latter charge is undoubtedly not entirely without substance;
homosexuality can be found in all civilisations down the ages, but
the spread of the homosexual lifestyle as an ideology is entirely a
phenomenon of the modern world, and has been largely a white man's
disease. “Little brown boys” have long held an especial
fascination for a certain type of white homosexual. In his diaries,
the unrepentant homosexual libertine Joe Orton relates in graphic
detail how on a visit to Tangier he raped a fifteen year old boy.
(43) The phenomenon of “sex tourism”, which involves the abuse
of both young boys and young girls, is also a staple of Western
homosexuals and paedophiles.
In
recent years, much concern has been expressed over the AIDS
pandemic, particularly in Africa. While there is undoubtedly large
scale infection of African populations, most of this is not related
directly to homosexuality. Poor sanitation, poor concepts of health
care, poverty, and other factors, have been largely responsible
here. The truth about AIDS in Africa has also been greatly distorted
by propaganda.
If
someone dies from heart failure, cancer or some such in Central
Africa, no one bats an eyelid, but if the death can be attributed to
AIDS, there will be genuine concern - and funding.
The
ubiquitous Peter Tatchell (44) has written that “Contrary to the
mythology that Aids is a gay plague, the overwhelming majority of
people with Aids are heterosexual, including as many women as
men...Most of these Aids cases are in central Africa...In Africa it
is estimated that 6% of the total population is now infected but in
some countries it is much higher - 25% of the Malawi population, 23%
of the Ugandan population...” (45) African academics rightly
dispute this; (46) AIDS exists in the modern world primarily if not
exclusively because of homosexual filth; Tatchell and his ilk are
shown in their true colours when they try to scapegoat ethnic
minorities for the poison their sinful practices have created and
spread.
Endnote
- Hope For The Damned
It
should be noted that some, perhaps many, homosexuals realise they
are spiritually sick. The Englishman Quentin Crisp was perhaps the
most flamboyant homosexual who ever lived, but was himself opposed
to gay rights and in favour of a world without homosexuals and
homosexuality. A few years ago when there was much talk about a
“gay gene”, he expressed support for the right of women to abort
“homosexual foetuses” because “the world would be better
without homosexuals”. (47)
At
that time, Crisp, who was 88 years old, (48) had been celibate for
half a century. He acknowledged that this view would enrage
homosexual activists because “They are so angry about everything.
I do know why they are angry, because they are unsatisfied...' He
added that he avoided them himself. (49) Another homosexual - and
tortured soul - who clearly held similar views was Kenneth Halliwell
who committed suicide thirty years previously after murdering his
partner-in-sin. (50)
Both
Halliwell and Crisp thought there was no hope, but in spite of the
dirty trick nature played on him, Crisp had himself found an inner
peace. As for all diseases of the spirit, homosexuality can be cured
by a spiritual approach. (51) If the United States has been the
major spawning ground for the homosexual lifestyle, a great
spiritual movement also has its home there. This is the modern
self-help group, the prototype for which is Alcoholics Anonymous.
The
philosophy of such groups: Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics
Anonymous, etc, is based on the belief that their affliction is a
spiritual illness, one that can be arrested but not cured. There is
a saying that for alcoholics, the first drink is the one that must
be avoided. The point being of course that there can be no second
drink without the first.
This
programme, while successful, is unnecessarily pessimistic, for it is
the act of drinking to excess habitually that defines the alcoholic.
A teetotal alcoholic is not an alcoholic at all. By the same token,
a non-practising homosexual is not a homosexual. It can - and will -
be argued that homosexuals are those who desire other men carnally,
but one could make out a similar case for murderers. Is there any
one of us who has not at some time desired to, wanted to or
fantasised about killing someone, be it a personal enemy, an
ideological enemy, or whatever? It would be absurd to brand a man a
murderer simply because he desired to kill someone. (52)
Homosexuals
cannot help having perverted desires any more than can alcoholics
have cravings for alcohol, but such desires can be reduced or
eliminated completely by training. The most obvious such technique
is to avoid temptation: just as the compulsive gambler can steer
clear of gaming establishments, and the drug addict can steer clear
of known drug users and pushers, so too can the homosexual steer
clear of those who engage in such practices, and avoid the
temptations that will cross his path.
One
does not have to be a Moslem, a Christian or have any religious
affiliations to realise this. The Homosexual Lobby is extremely
powerful, and its lying, deceitful and poisonous propaganda is
reaching more and more into the minds of especially the young. It
must be rooted out like the cancer it is, but it is not enough
simply to condemn homosexuality.
According
to homosexual activist Dennis Altman: “The willingness to have sex
immediately, promiscuously, and with people about whom one knows
nothing and from whom one demands only physical contact can be seen
as a sort of Whitmanesque democracy, a desire to know and trust
other men in a type of brotherhood.” (53)
However
revolted they may be by their depraved and corrupt practices,
Moslems must be willing to reach out to homosexuals and nascent
homosexuals offering them a genuine alternative to this sick,
twisted, demonic concept of the brotherhood of man. In his
autobiography, the former black radical Malcolm X, who was once
infused with a burning hatred of the white man, wrote movingly of
his spiritual conversion to true Islam on making the Hajj: “In two
weeks in the Holy Land, I saw what I never had seen in thirty-nine
years here in America. I saw all races, all colors, - blue-eyed
blonds to black-skinned Africans - in true brotherhood! In unity!
Living as one! Worshiping as one!” (54)
This
is where the true brotherhood of man lies, on the spiritual plane.
One sophistry used by the Organised Homosexual Movement to subvert
the Christian religion is that God loves all men, including
homosexuals. This is true, but God loves thieves, adulterers and
murderers too. Of course, this does not mean that dishonesty,
adultery and murder are virtues. Even murderers can be redeemed, but
not until they renounce their sins. Likewise homosexuals.
Notes & References
(1)
A popular singer of that era.
(2)
The Short Arm of the Law THE MEMOIRS OF WILLIAM MERRILEES OBE Chief
Constable The Lothians and Peebles Constabulary, published by John
Long, London, (1966), page 118.
(3)
Three of the most notorious serial killers of the modern era were
homosexuals: the Americans “Killer Clown” John Wayne Gacy and
the cannibal Jeffrey Dahmer; and the English necrophiliac Denis
Nilsen. Gacy was executed; Dahmer was murdered in prison; Nilsen is
serving a life sentence.
(4)
THE MANUFACTURE OF MADNESS “A Comparative Study of the Inquisition
and the Mental Health Movement”, by Thomas S. Szasz, published by
Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, (1997), page xi.
(5)
Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Homosexual Men: Diagnosis,
Treatment, and Research, Edited by David G. Ostrow and others,
published by Plenum Medical Book Company, New York, (1983), page 8.
(6)
The homosexual lobby extends far beyond the Organised Homosexual
Movement and includes many - mainly leftist - individuals and
political organisations.
(7)
Also known as Labour Left Briefing, this magazine devotes more space
to campaigning against the Labour Party than for it. It is
particularly hostile to Tony Blair.
(8)
A few inches of flesh, by Peter Tatchell, published in, Labour
Briefing, February 1993, page 14.
(9)
In view of their incredible findings, it remains to be seen if the
Kinsey reports were as well read as publicised.
(10)
SEXUAL BEHAVIOR IN THE HUMAN MALE, by Alfred C. Kinsey, Wardell B.
Pomeroy and Clyde E. Martin, published by W.B. Saunders,
Philadelphia, (1948).
(11)
Kinsey, Sexual Behavior In The Human Male, page 671, (ibid).
(12)
THE SEXUAL DEAD-END, by Stephen Green, published by Broad View,
London, (1992), page 62.
(13)
Dr Judith Reisman is Kinsey's most vociferous critic; an Orthodox
Jewess, she is also a staunch opponent of such openly subversive
quasi-Jewish organisations as the misnamed Anti-Defamation League.
(14)
KINSEY, SEX AND FRAUD The Indoctrination Of A People, by Judith A.
Reisman & Edward W. Eichel, published by Lochinvar-Huntington
House, Lafayette, Louisiana, (1990), page vii.
(15)
Reisman and Eichel, Kinsey, Sex And Fraud, page 15 (ibid).
(16)
London, Manchester and Brighton in England; San Francisco and New
York in the United States.
(17)
The media and the arts in particular, but also, most unfortunately,
in increasingly mainstream politics.
(18)
An outrageous example of this appeared in the Daily Mail in October
1999. This newspaper is no friend of either homosexuals or the
politically correct left, yet in an article Perks victory for rail
workers' gay partners it reported that “With up to five million
homosexual workers in Britain, this could cost industry tens of
millions of pounds.” Five million is about one in four of the
workforce!
(19)
One of the first overtly homosexual MPs (later Cabinet Minister) was
Chris Smith, who is a moderate. There was also Peter Mandelson (who
was demonised by the media for other reasons) and the sexually
confused Ron Davies, who resigned as Welsh Secretary in 1998 after
his notorious “moment of madness” on Clapham Common.
(20)
The Times February 22, page 1. Among other things they shouted
“Scum” and “Shame on you” at MPs.
(21)
Daily Telegraph, February 22, 1994, page 1.
(22)
Private Eye, Friday 13 Nov. '98, No. 963, page 6.
(23)
Dr Hassan Irfan and Dr Jafar Qureshi. The letter was published in
the November 13, 2000 edition at page 19.
(24)
To borrow from his own terminology.
25)
WHY THE AGE OF SEXUAL CONSENT IN BRITAIN SHOULD BE LOWERED TO
FOURTEEN, Legal Notes No. 38, published by the Libertarian Alliance,
London, (2002).
(26)
This sort of gross exaggeration is a regular sensationalist tactic
of both the tabloid press and extremists. There is a principle that
the sentence should be proportional to the crime taking into
consideration all the circumstances, including relevant previous
convictions. Unduly severe sentences are regularly struck down by
the Court of Appeal.
(27)
Teenage boys who have one or two actual physical relationships with
other boys and then move on are no more homosexual than are those
who may experiment with drugs are junkies.
(28)
The Paedophile Information Exchange “was started by male
homosexual paedophiles from within the gay movement.” It
advertised initially in predominantly male homosexual publications
as evinced by the claim that “our only regular form of advertising
is still a mention every two weeks in the guide section of Gay
News.[Paedophile Information Exchange Survey of Members, (published
August 1976 c/o Release, London), page 6].
(29)
Merrilees, The Short Arm of the Law, page 118, (op cit).
(30)
Ostrow, Sexually Transmitted Diseases..., page 4, (op cit).
(31)
Ostrow, Sexually Transmitted Diseases..., page 4, (ibid).
(32)
Ostrow, Sexually Transmitted Diseases..., page 39, (ibid).
(33)
One book aimed at the lay reader which contains particularly graphic
and shocking descriptions of the physical damage homosexuals inflict
on themselves and on each other is THE AIDS COVER-UP? The Real and
Alarming Facts about AIDS, by Gene Antonio, published by Ignatius
Press, San Francisco, Second edition, (1987).
Another,
slightly more academic book, The Silent Community: Public Homosexual
Encounters, by Edward William Delph, published by Sage Publications,
London, (1978), contains equally graphic and shocking descriptions
of homosexual practices. The author appears to have researched this
work in situ.
(34)
In his essay The Heterosexual Victims of Homophobia, * Terry
Sanderson, says the
word homophobia was coined by Wainwright Churchill in his 1967 book
Homosexual Behaviour Among Males.
*
Published in NEW Humanist, September 1991, Volume 106, No 3, pages
5-6.
(35)
Reisman and Eichel, Kinsey, Sex And Fraud, page 117 (op cit).
(36)
Reisman and Eichel, Kinsey, Sex And Fraud, page 117 (ibid).
(37)
Reisman and Eichel, Kinsey, Sex And Fraud, page 103, (ibid).
(38)
Time, February 7, 1994, VOL 143, NO.6, page 64.
(39)
Homosexual persecution under the Nazis detailed: Gay groups stage
landmark London conference, by Susannah Cusworth, published in the
Jewish Chronicle, September 15, 1995, page 13.
(40)
Reisman and Eichel, Kinsey, Sex And Fraud, page 110, (op cit).
(41)
These attempts include literature aimed at children such as the 1991
book HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF YOUR DAD WAS GAY?, which tells the
fictional story of a young black girl named Jasmine who lives with
her homosexual father and his male “lover”. Such gay families do
not exist.
(42)
Capital Gay, June 24, 1994, page 1.
(43)
The playwright John Kingsley (Joe) Orton was murdered by his
homosexual lover Kenneth Halliwell in August 1967. His quite
shocking diaries edited by John Lahr were published posthumously in
1986.
(44)
Tatchell's photograph appeared on the front cover of the August
12th, 1994 issue of the homosexual newspaper Capital Gay. He was
being led away by two police officers after being arrested outside a
Hizb-ut-Tahrir conference in Wembley where he was carrying a sign
proclaiming ISLAM NAZIS BEHEAD AND BURN QUEERS.
(45)
AIDS, AFRICA AND RACISM, by Richard and Rosalind Chirimuuta, New and
revised edition, published by Free Association Books, London,
(1989), page 6. The authors are quoting Tatchell from 7 Days,
OCTOBER 18, 1986.
(46)
Chirimuuta and Chirimuuta, AIDS, Africa And Racism, (ibid).
(47)
One does not have to share this Hitlerian view to see where Crisp
was coming from.
(48)
He lived to be ninety, an exceptional age indeed for homosexuals,
who generally die an early death.
(49)
'Stately homo' backs call to abort gay babies, by Dominic Kennedy,
published in the Times, February 17, 1997, page 7.
(50)
Halliwell's lover was Joe Orton (see above); in August 1967, he
battered Orton to death before taking a drug overdose.
(51)
Which is what Crisp had achieved through celibacy.
(52)
A typical scenario is after an accused is convicted in a notorious
child murder case; outraged members of the public - many of them
mothers - express understandable desires to see the perpetrator put
to death.
(53)
The Myth Of Heterosexual AIDS, by Michael Fumento, published by
Basic Books, New York, (1990), page 233.
(54)
The Autobiography of MALCOLM X, by Malcolm X with the assistance of
Alex Haley, published by Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, (1968),
page 478.
Author:
Alexander Baron |
Date Published:
Nov 2002 |
Back To Top
|